Madison Sieg vs Merna Refaat Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 08:02 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Sieg vs M. Refaat

 USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 EGY
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sieg 1 - 0 Refaat
They have played 2 sets in total, with Madison Sieg winning 2 and Merna Refaat winning 0. The last match between Madison Sieg and Merna Refaat was at the W35 San Rafael, 01-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Madison Sieg getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Sieg | 1 | 
| Refaat | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 San Rafael(10-01-25)
M. Sieg vs M. Refaat H2H Profile
M. Sieg vs M. Refaat Match Preview:
- Merna Refaat wins 37.68% of points on her second serve, slightly less than Madison Sieg's 39.19%. Could this give Sieg a slight edge in serve-related points?
- Refaat is stronger in returning second serves, claiming 53.90% of opponent's points compared to Sieg's 49.92%. Does this suggest Refaat might be more effective in breaking serves?
- In terms of saving breakpoints under pressure, Refaat excels by saving 48.89%, whereas Sieg manages 40.54%. Does this indicate that Refaat is potentially steadier during critical moments?
- Refaat's match-winning rate over the past year stands at 64.29% compared to Sieg's 42.31%. Could this indicate Refaat's superior overall form?
- Both players have their best surface win percentage on I.hard at 67%. This suggests an even footing if this upcoming match is on this surface.
- Refaat has a higher win percentage in ITF tournaments > $10K at 68.18% versus Sieg's 42.31%. Does this reflect Refaat's stronger performance in lower-tier events?
- The average opponent rank for Refaat over the past year is 556.25, while Sieg has faced an average rank of 376.62. Might Sieg's experience against tougher opponents provide an unnoticed advantage?
- In deciding sets, Sieg has won 53% compared to Refaat's 44%. Could this demonstrate Sieg's resilience in tight situations?
- It is crucial to consider current event stats and player performance trends when predicting the match outcome.
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
Merna Refaat exhibits superior return game performance, especially on second serves, which could disrupt Madison Sieg's gameplay significantly.
Refaat saves a higher percentage of breakpoints, underscoring her steadiness during critical phases of matches.
With a higher overall match-winning rate this past year, Refaat appears to be in better form compared to Sieg, despite participating in events with lower-ranked opponents.
Sieg, however, boasts a better win rate in deciding sets and has faced tougher competition, which might lend her experience a valuable edge.
Based on an assessment of recent performances, Merna Refaat seems more likely to win the upcoming match.
Madison Sieg vs Merna Refaat Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Sieg vs M. Refaat H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 8 | 
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 | 
| 1:39:22 | Average Match Time | 1:39:22 | 
| 74% (43/58) | 1st Serve % | 77% (48/62) | 
| 60% (26/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (26/48) | 
| 67% (10/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6/14) | 
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) | 
| 48% (30/62) | Return Points Win % | 38% (22/58) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
M. Sieg Recent Matches Played
M. Refaat Recent Matches Played

M. Sieg vs M. Refaat Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.13% (119/105) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.32% (106/118) | 
| 51.38% (260/246) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.10% (240/259) | 
| 50.36% (2289/2256) | Games Win/Loss | 48.76% (2202/2314) | 
| 53.17% (67/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.02% (79/70) | 
| 53.25% (41/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 34.72% (25/47) | 
| 52.38% (11/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) | 
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 | 
| 253 | Aces Total | 107 | 
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.52 | 
| 767 | Total Double Faults | 1154 | 
| 1:43:8 | Average Match Time | 1:22:31 | 
| 451.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 452.94 | 
| 63% (8653/13811) | 1st Serve % | 61% (7102/11731) | 
| 59% (5127/8653) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (4070/7102) | 
| 45% (2316/5158) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (1839/4629) | 
| 48% (882/1821) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (799/1628) | 
| 46% (6541/14144) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5712/11995) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/2) | 
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 51.05% (97/93) | Challenger W/L | 56.86% (29/22) | 
| 68.75% (22/10) | Futures W/L | 45.03% (77/94) | 
| 53% (116/219) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (104/220) | 
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 56% (19/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 70% (23/33) | 
| 61% (36/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (25/55) | 
| 89% (113/101) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (109/96) | 
| 11% (113/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (109/12) | 
| 16% (111/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (115/10) | 












